CTV’s Next Chapter: Why Unified Monetisation Will Decide Streaming’s Winners
The streaming economy is no longer defined by growth at any cost, but by the ability to monetise efficiently without compromising the viewer experience. As ad tiers multiply, publishers are being forced to rethink their strategies as the fundamental challenge entails not just filling ad slots, but doing so efficiently, transparently, and sustainably.
Behind the scenes, however, monetisation is often a patchwork process with systems operating independently and oftentimes competing rather than complementing one another. This introduces friction for publishers and buyers, and can impact efficiency and performance. Mediation offers a path forward that, if implemented correctly, can help publishers turn this complexity into a competitive advantage while also providing benefits for advertisers.
Why Mediation Matters Now
While the fragmentation of CTV isn’t going away, what the industry needs now is smarter coordination. Mediation delivers that by creating a shared decision layer where every impression is valued on the same playing field.
Long a staple in mobile advertising, mediation is gaining traction in CTV where the ad experience is more complex. To win in this environment, publishers need a unified layer that can access diverse demand, apply custom yield rules, and optimise pod construction without sacrificing campaign quality.
Benefits for Both Sides of the Marketplace
When executed well, mediation offers several advantages for publishers, including flexibility in how demand is prioritised, improvements to yield through increased competition, and centralised inventory management. Buyers also see gains through cleaner supply paths, fewer hops, and higher data match rates.
However, mediation is only as effective as the demand that feeds into it. Put simply, a sophisticated tech layer without meaningful demand doesn’t deliver better results. As supply path optimisation (SPO) strategies become more advanced, buyers are consolidating around platforms that offer direct access to premium environments, better transparency, and more consistent outcomes. That, in turn, places pressure on publishers to ensure their mediation strategies are connected to high-quality, performance-driving demand sources.
The shift toward mediation requires publishers to think beyond the short-term and consider how to position their supply for long-term growth. That means reducing unnecessary complexity, embracing operational efficiencies, and ensuring they’re not running two or three separate monetisation layers in parallel. Doing so not only increases cost and complexity, but can also impact performance and the viewer experience.
The future of streaming monetisation may depend on publishers treating mediation as an operating system rather than just a feature to unify ad serving, data activation, and optimisation in a single environment.
Looking Ahead
As live streaming, dynamic ad insertion and AI-driven workflows continue to mature, the pressure will only grow for publishers to consolidate, streamline, and optimise how they approach monetisation. Mediation offers a foundation for the ecosystem that balances revenue goals with user experience and control with scalability.
In 2026, the winners in streaming won’t be those with the most content or the deepest data sets, but rather those who can make every second of ad time work harder by intelligently orchestrating demand, minimising efficiencies, and building monetisation strategies that are unified by design.
[Editor's note: This is a contributed article from Magnite. Streaming Media accepts vendor bylines based solely on their value to our readers.]
Related Articles
Gijsbert Pols, Director of Connected TV & New Channels for Adjust, outlines three key CTV trends to watch for in 2024.
30 Jan 2024