Register now and get Early Bird pricing for Streaming Media 2025, October 6-8, in Santa Monica, CA! 

With live sport streaming, control the platform, control the game

Article Featured Image

It used to be broadcaster vs. broadcaster: Sky Sports vs. BT Sport, ESPN vs. Fox. One won the rights, the other waited for the next cycle.

Now, it’s Apple, Amazon, and YouTube alongside traditional broadcasters, leagues, and even individual clubs fighting for control. The battleground has shifted. It’s not just about delivering coverage anymore. It’s about owning the entire fan relationship.

Streaming platforms, tech giants, and traditional broadcasters are all fighting to become the destination for live sport viewers. And in the middle of it all are the fans, facing rising costs, fractured access, and a growing sense of fatigue.

The rights war has become a platform war. And no one’s sitting on the sidelines.

From broadcasters to ecosystems

Traditional broadcasters built their empires on reach and exclusivity. Lock in the rights, control the coverage, dominate the narrative. But that playbook doesn’t work in a platform world.

Big tech operates differently. Apple, Amazon, and YouTube aren’t just interested in showing the game. They want to own the entire ecosystem around it: subscriptions, devices, data, commerce, advertising, interaction. Sport is just the entry point.

Take Apple’s deal with MLS. It’s not just a broadcast deal. It’s a product strategy. It drives Apple TV+ subscriptions, iOS engagement, global branding, and fan loyalty inside their ecosystem. Amazon’s investment in the Premier League did the same. Prime Video drives Prime memberships, which drive retail sales, which keep fans inside their world.

apple mls
Apple’s deal with MLS is built to drive engagement across the Apple ecosystem

This isn’t sport as content. This is sport as infrastructure. And it’s where the power is shifting.

Leagues and clubs want in

It’s not just the platforms making moves. Leagues and clubs are starting to ask a bigger question: Why license our content out when we could stream it ourselves?

The NBA has invested heavily in its own league-wide D2C app. Simultaneously, individual franchises like the Utah Jazz are going further, launching fully independent platforms such as Jazz+ to control both their content and fan relationship. In Europe, clubs like Barcelona are deploying subscription streaming as well, deepening engagement and diversifying monetisation.

utah jazz nba jazz+ d2c streaming channel
The Utah Jazz’s Jazz+ D2C streaming channel offers multiple tiers and plans and surpassed 20,000 subscribers in 2024.

Across the board, there’s a growing push to go direct. The NFL now produces entire shows on YouTube. Even tier-two leagues and niche sports are launching OTT services aimed at superfans.

But wanting to be a platform and building a viable one are very different things.

Running a world-class streaming product takes more than match footage and a mobile app. It requires UX, customer service, CRM, multi-language content, rights management, monetisation tools, and an editorial team that knows how to produce for digital-first audiences. Few clubs are built for that.

Still, the ambition is there. Everyone wants to be their own channel, even if they’re not ready to create their own platform.

FC Barcelona BARCA TV subscription streaming service
FC Barcelona’s
BARÇA TV+ subscription streaming service

Subscription fatigue and fragmentation

For fans, the shift to platform-driven sport has come at a cost—literally.

To follow a single team or competition now often means juggling multiple subscriptions across different apps, devices, and logins. Premier League matches on Sky, TNT Sports, and Amazon. Champions League spread across TNT Sports and Amazon. And that’s before factoring in club-owned services or international coverage.

It’s not just expensive. It’s exhausting. The experience is fragmented, discovery is painful, and the emotional connection to the sport gets lost in the process.

The impact isn’t limited to homes, either. Pubs and clubs still pay a premium for commercial licences from broadcasters like Sky and TNT Sports to draw in fans and drive footfall. But as rights fragment across platforms, and some move behind streaming-only paywalls, how sustainable is that model? Will fans still turn up if they can't be sure the match is even available?

What used to be a ritual—watching your team on a familiar channel—is becoming a piecemeal, transactional relationship. For younger fans in particular, there’s little loyalty to any one platform. If the experience isn’t seamless, they’ll skip it, stream it unofficially, or follow the highlights on TikTok.

The streaming era promised flexibility and control. What many fans are feeling instead is fatigue.

Who owns the fan relationship?

Reaching, retaining, and leveraging viewers is where the real battle occurs. It’s not about who gets the rights, but who owns the relationship with the fan.

Big tech platforms understand this better than anyone. For Amazon, YouTube, or Apple, streaming sport is just one touchpoint in a much bigger funnel. Every viewer is a data profile. Every interaction is part of a long-term engagement strategy that links to shopping, social, content, or device usage.

By contrast, many rights holders still treat streaming as a one-way broadcast. But owning the fan experience now means understanding behaviours, building communities, and delivering personalised, always-on content, not just showing a match and logging off.

Leagues and clubs may technically own the rights, but increasingly it's the platforms that shape how fans consume, engage, and pay. Control is shifting from the pitch to the interface.

And whoever controls that interface controls the future.

The next few seasons will decide everything

The battle for rights is no longer just a negotiation. It’s a structural shift in how sport is produced, packaged, and experienced.

Everyone wants to be the platform—the broadcasters, the tech giants, the leagues. Even the clubs. But in a landscape defined by fragmentation, rising costs and shifting habits, only those who truly understand the value of fan connection will last.

The winners won’t be the ones who simply show the match. They’ll be the ones who own the moment, shape the experience, and give fans a reason to come back again and again.

The ones who hold the rights might win the deal. The ones who hold the relationship will shape the future of the game.

Streaming Covers
Free
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

Why Speed is Reshaping Sports Media Economics

Today's fans, especially younger viewers, aren't waiting for highlight shows or replays. They demand near-instant access to clips, behind-the-scenes exclusives, and viral moments across social feeds, apps, and OTT platforms to complement multi-screen viewing habits.

Who Owns the Emotion in Sport?

The most powerful moments in sport aren't being broadcast. They're being clipped, remixed, and shared long before the highlights drop.

DIY Broadcast: How Underrepresented Sports Are Building Their Own Streaming Stacks

That's changing. With automated cameras, cloud production platforms, and AI-driven tools now capable of delivering the full suite of broadcast workflows—from live switching and graphics to clipping, highlights, and distribution—sports that once had no way to show themselves are building their own streaming stacks. They're not waiting to be picked up. They're going live—and taking control.

The State of Live Sport Streaming 2025

The sport media sector continues to undergo rapid change, with streaming aggregators attempting to reconsolidate for greater ef­ficiency but still falling short of traditional broadcast models in reach and revenue.