When Live Sport Isn’t Live
For most fans, the gap between “live” and real time isn’t about seconds, it’s about moments. It’s the roar from the pub before the goal appears on your screen. It’s the WhatsApp message seconds before the ball hits the net. It’s your neighbour’s cheer while your stream is still building the attack.
In sport, that gap matters. It breaks the shared moment that live sport is built on.
It’s not just about spoilers either. Multi-device households see smart TVs, laptops, and mobiles all seconds apart. And for in-play betting, the opportunity is dead unless the feed is as fast as the quickest available source. Right now, that means big-event OTT sport is shut out from unlocking the untapped potential of single-device betting, because the stream simply isn’t quick enough to keep pace.
Where the Delay Creeps In
The latency problem doesn’t start in the production gallery. Cameras work in real time. Directors, producers, and camera operators are already seeing and working with the live action as it happens.
The delay starts the moment playout leaves the gallery. From there, every stage adds delay; encoding, transcoding, CDN routing, buffering at the player. Segment-based protocols like HLS and DASH inherently add seconds, often pushing streams noticeably behind broadcast.
Platforms make trade-offs between speed, stability, scale, and features like ad insertion. For most, stability wins. That’s why traditional broadcast (satellite and terrestrial) is always faster than streaming in real-world viewing conditions.
Who’s Actually Winning the Low-Latency Race
Large-scale sports streaming still prioritises stability, scale, and monetisation workflows over shaving off every possible second. For big matches, platforms often accept higher latency as long as it’s consistent and stable.
Low-latency is possible. BT Media & Broadcast’s IBC Accelerator project demonstrated that sub-2-second glass-to-glass latency is technically possible using open, scalable HTTP streaming stacks, but it remains a proof of concept, not a full commercial deployment across all device types and delivery paths.
YouTube and Amazon have both improved latency for live sport, but in most viewing scenarios, streaming still trails the quickest broadcast paths.
Why Betting and Interactivity Are Game Changers
In-play betting lives or dies on speed. Even small delays can leave fans trying to bet on moments that have already happened. The dream of single-device integration (watch the match and place the bet on the same screen) isn’t realistic when the stream is already behind.
The same goes for interactive features like multi-camera angles, live polls, and “watch together” applications. If viewers are seconds apart, the shared experience breaks.
The commercial upside for betting and interactivity in sport is huge, but only if delivery infrastructure can match or beat broadcast timing.
Why Fixing Latency Has to Be a Delivery Problem
Latency is a delivery problem, not a production problem. Creative teams need to focus on telling the story of the match, not worrying about how many seconds behind the fan at home might be.
The solution sits in the delivery chain, smarter encoding, faster CDN routing, better player behaviour. It requires every part of the post-playout process to be tuned for sport, not just generic video. Standards like CMAF and better buffering strategies can help, but the real gains come from rethinking every stage between playout and the player.
Race to the Bottom Can’t Be the Answer
In every meeting about latency, one “easy option” comes up: just match every platform’s delay to the slowest in the chain. On paper, it solves the sync problem. It kills innovation and makes the problem even worse if rights are shared and the same game is being shown on more than one broadcaster. You could even be getting spoilers from your friend in a different country!
Locking everything to the highest latency removes any reason to push delivery forward. It’s a race to the bottom.
And it still doesn’t fix the player problem. Device buffering, app behaviour, and OS quirks are outside the control of broadcasters and platforms. You can slow down the fastest feed all you like, a mobile app with aggressive buffering will still be late.
Fans don’t care that “everyone is equally behind.” They care about being in the moment. The target must be lifting the fastest up, not slowing the best down.
The Moment Matters
Low latency is not a nice-to-have. It’s the difference between being in the moment and watching it on delay. In sport, the moment is the product.
The real challenge is that latency must be fixed in delivery, without touching how production works. It means driving every part of the chain to work faster, from playout through encoding, CDN, and player to perform at its best. It means resisting the temptation to slow the fastest down just to make things look tidy.
Fans will not tolerate a future where live sport is noticeably behind the action. They’ll drift to faster platforms, to unofficial streams, or just skip the live experience entirely. That’s lost audience, lost engagement, and lost revenue.
The winners will be the ones who solve for speed without sacrificing scale or stability. They’ll treat latency as a core part of the product, not an afterthought. Own the moment, own the fan.
Related Articles
The BBC has taken its trial of Low Latency DASH with chunked CMAF segments to the next stage by assessing how well its approach performs when received by viewers watching marquee sports and music events on iPlayer at home. The trial, which is for select viewers of BBC Two viewed live on iPlayer, will likely include music festival Glastonbury, tennis championship Wimbledon and the Women's soccer Euros which all start by the end of June or beginning of July.
06 Jun 2025
This report expands on live presentations from a recent Streaming Connect keynote.
10 Dec 2024